NAR to Appeal Burnett Trial Verdict: A Closer Look at the MLS Rules and Real Estate Compensation Model
In a recent press release, the National Association of REALTORS® (NAR) announced its intention to appeal the verdict in the Sitzer/Burnett trial. The jury found NAR, along with HomeServices of America and Keller Williams Realty, liable in a case that challenged MLS rules and the real estate compensation model. This development has significant implications for the real estate industry and has sparked further discussions around consumer-friendly marketplaces and fair competition.
Understanding the Trial: The Sitzer/Burnett trial, which took place over 11 days, focused on the MLS rules and alleged issues with the real estate compensation structure. The plaintiffs argued that buyer representation should only be available to wealthy buyers who can afford it out-of-pocket and claimed that commission rates were excessively high. They also contended that NAR rules and the practices of corporate defendants led to fixed pricing.
In response, NAR maintained that MLS rules prioritize consumers, support market-driven pricing, and promote business competition. The association argued that these rules ensure efficient, transparent, and equitable local broker marketplaces. NAR emphasized the benefits to sellers, who can sell their homes for more and reach a wider pool of buyers, as well as to buyers, who have more choices and affordable representation.
NAR’s Commitment and Appeal: Despite the jury’s verdict, NAR remains committed to advocating for pro-consumer and pro-competition practices. The association plans to appeal the decision, acknowledging that the process could take several years to resolve. NAR believes that MLS rules are essential for the real estate industry’s functioning and is confident in its ultimate success.
Key Takeaways from the Trial: Throughout the trial, several key points emerged, shedding light on NAR’s purpose, its role in the real estate market, and the value it provides to its members and clients. NAR exists as a trade association to uphold higher levels of ethical practice in real estate. The association’s rules are made through a public rulemaking process and are shared consistently with the public. NAR does not set or receive commissions for buyers’ or sellers’ agents.
It is important to note that NAR membership is exclusive to real estate professionals who have access to robust benefits, including health, home, and auto insurance. REALTORS® play a critical role in guiding consumers through the complexities of buying a home, inputting information into local broker marketplaces, and contributing to the protection of consumers and generational wealth.
Understanding Broker Compensation: The trial also highlighted the negotiable nature of agent compensation between brokers and their clients. NAR has publicly available guidance for its members on this matter, ensuring transparency for buyers and sellers. The cooperative compensation rule safeguards both parties’ interests and ensures that the buyer broker knows their payment before commencing work. If buyers had to pay out-of-pocket for representation, it could potentially reduce the number of buyers and the funds available for purchasing homes.
Looking Ahead: As the appeal process unfolds, the real estate industry will closely monitor the developments surrounding MLS rules and the real estate compensation model. The outcome of this case could reshape how transactions are conducted and how real estate professionals operate within the market.
Conclusion: The NAR’s decision to appeal the verdict in the Sitzer/Burnett trial signifies its unwavering commitment to promoting pro-consumer and pro-competition practices within the real estate industry. As the appeal moves forward, the implications of this case will reverberate throughout the market, prompting discussions on MLS rules and the real estate compensation model. The future of real estate transactions hangs in the balance as stakeholders await further legal proceedings.
Sources: