315-432-1045 [email protected]

The real estate sector has witnessed many ups and downs over the years, but legal disputes can bring about particularly challenging moments. A recent pivotal event was the settlement between Anywhere (previously known as Realogy) and plaintiffs in the Sitzer and Moehrl commission lawsuits. Anywhere’s decision to settle for $83.5 million has ramifications not just for the company, but for the broader real estate community, especially for other defendants including the National Association of Realtors (NAR).  

Background on the Lawsuits  

For those unfamiliar with the case, the Sitzer and Moehrl lawsuits alleged anti-competitive behavior by large real estate companies. The plaintiffs contended that these companies conspired to fix commission rates at a high level, negatively impacting home sellers. The central argument was that the collaboration between listing and buyer’s brokers to split commissions in a certain way infringed upon antitrust laws.  

Why the Settlement is Significant  

  1. Reflection on the Industry: The decision by Anywhere to settle might be perceived as an admission that certain business practices within the industry may be questionable. While a settlement is not a confession of guilt, it does suggest that companies are looking to avoid the negative publicity and uncertainty that a prolonged court battle can bring.
  2. Financial Impact: Anywhere, a prominent player in the real estate industry, has decided to settle these lawsuits to avoid prolonged litigation and potential reputational damage. $83.5 million is a substantial amount. Such settlements can strain company resources, potentially leading to shifts in operational strategies. It is also worth noting that while this settlement addresses the immediate legal challenges for Anywhere, it does not prevent future lawsuits on similar grounds. This settlement marks a significant turning point for the company and demonstrates its commitment to resolving the allegations made against it. As part of the settlement, Anywhere has agreed to modify certain practices and embrace greater transparency in its operations.
  3. Setting a Precedent: The fact that one of the major players in the real estate sector has settled might influence decisions made by other companies facing similar litigation. It could encourage other defendants to consider settlements as a viable option rather than pursuing protracted legal battles.

Implications for the National Association of Realtors (NAR) and Other Defendants  

  1. Increased Scrutiny: The NAR, being a major stakeholder in the industry, might find itself under increased public and legal scrutiny. There may be pressure for the association to revisit some of its policies and guidelines to ensure they are compliant with antitrust laws.
  2. Potential for Further Legal Challenges: The settlement could motivate other home sellers or entities to file similar lawsuits, alleging anti-competitive behavior. This could put other real estate companies, including members of NAR, on the defensive.
  3. Reputation Management: For NAR and other defendants, managing public perception will be essential. Ensuring transparency, educating the public about commission structures, and revisiting some of the traditional practices could be necessary steps moving forward.

The settlement between Anywhere and plaintiffs of the Sitzer and Moehrl commission lawsuits marks a significant event in the real estate industry’s ongoing evolution. As real estate agents and professionals, it’s vital to stay informed about these developments, understand their implications, and be prepared to adapt to an ever-changing landscape. This case serves as a reminder that the real estate sector, like many others, is not immune to legal challenges and the necessity for continual introspection and evolution. 



  • Disclaimer: This content is provided for informational purposes only and should not be construed as legal advice.  The reader should not act or rely upon any information in this post without seeking professional legal counsel. The accuracy, completeness, adequacy, or currency of the content is not warranted or guaranteed.  Always consult with a qualified legal professional for advice specific to your situation.